IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #csharp

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[20:29]<drygq>do strings derive from chars..?
[20:30]<mjzymygo>main2: ?
[20:30]<drygq>well... a 'string' is not a real data type
[20:30]<mjzymygo>a string is technically an array of chars...
[20:30]<drygq>thats what i wanned to know yes
[20:31]<mjzymygo>uh.. ok.
[20:31]<vufvuzn>well a C# "string" is a type that is distinct from a char[]..
[20:31]<drygq>maybe i should fill a string with something.. then compile it
[20:31]<drygq>watch the il
[20:31]<mjzymygo>main2... what are you trying to find out?
[20:31]<drygq>how c# works/ inside out
[20:32]<mjzymygo>here is the string object for .net
[20:32]<mjzymygo>http://dotnet.di.unipi.it/Content/sscli/docs/doxygen/fx/bcl/string_8cs-source.html
[20:32]<vufvuzn>main2: string is just a class like any other class in the API..
[20:32]<mjzymygo>the string stuff isn't C#... it's .NET
[20:32]<vufvuzn>it's probably got a singel char[] as a member, but that's irrelevent
[20:33]<mjzymygo>look at the source and all will be revealed ;)
[20:34]<drygq>[Serializable] public sealed class String : IComparable, ICloneable, IConvertible, IEnumerable
[20:34]<cjmgrug>also note that a string is immutable, normally
[20:35]<mjzymygo>unless you play with pointers ;)
[20:36]<cjmgrug>or stringBuilder :p
[20:36]<mjzymygo>stringbuilder takes a blit copy
[20:36]<cjmgrug>hm
[20:37]<mjzymygo>http://dotnet.di.unipi.it/Content/sscli/docs/doxygen/fx/bcl/stringbuilder_8cs-source.html
[20:38]<cjmgrug>hey.. Moridin8 i thought they never gave out the source of the framework's classes..
[20:39]<cjmgrug>source +code*
[20:40]<mjzymygo>it's free as part of Rotor
[20:40]<cjmgrug>Rotor?
[20:40]<mjzymygo>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=8C09FD61-3F26-4555-AE17-3121B4F51D4D&displaylang=en
[20:40]<mjzymygo>it's the shared source version of .net
[20:40]<cjmgrug>oh got it
[20:41]<mjzymygo>besides, using Reflector would show the code I just pasted urls up for
[20:41]<cjmgrug>ah i see
[20:42]<cjmgrug>man, reflector is dangerous :p
[20:43]<mjzymygo>Reflector is the mutts
[20:43]<mjzymygo>s/jumps/humps
[20:47]<`d0>HMM
[20:47]<`d0>how can you hump a reflector
[20:48]<mjzymygo>http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/ <-- have a play and then hump hump hump
[20:49]<`d0>:o
[20:54]<rrd2uppnv>how does winform datagridview binding differ from asp.net grid view binding ?
[20:55]<nnzjpfrr>I don't think it does...
[21:07]<rrd2uppnv>is it just me, or does the datagridview seem less flexible than the gridview
[21:08]<rrd2uppnv>i dont know what the hell im doing
[21:08]<fyfuym-syfggag>smellyhippy you here homie
[21:09]<fyfuym-syfggag>VirusDotNET
[21:09]<fyfuym-syfggag>kiryn sup
[21:10]<fyfuym-syfggag>Kog fag
[21:11]<fyfuym-syfggag>God I will never get a cloack
[21:11]<nnzjpfrr>what about me?
[21:11]<fyfuym-syfggag>zerofag!
[21:11]<fyfuym-syfggag>:D
[21:12]<fyfuym-syfggag>oh forgot the "l"
[21:12]<nnzjpfrr>what do I have to do with your cloack? :P
[21:12]<fyfuym-syfggag>heh
[21:12]<fyfuym-syfggag>zeroflag can I test dcc you something?
[21:12]<fyfuym-syfggag>I upgrade my network
[21:12]<fyfuym-syfggag>just want to see the throughput
[21:12]<nnzjpfrr>you can sure try but you won't have any luck with my bouncer. :)
[21:13]<fyfuym-syfggag>ghei!
[21:20]<afd>Liquid-Silence: !!!!!!!!
[21:21]<rrd2uppnv>ugh.. are there any examples out there with complex data binding in the datagridview
[21:21]<fyfuym-syfggag>AqD!!!!!!!!11
[21:21]<fyfuym-syfggag>sup bro
[21:22]<fyfuym-syfggag>jaybuffet I am datagrid god
[21:22]<fyfuym-syfggag>:)
[21:22]<fyfuym-syfggag>so ask away
[21:23]<fyfuym-syfggag>if my connection does not drop
[21:23]<fyfuym-syfggag>I will answer
[21:23]<rrd2uppnv>ok... i am trying to bind a custom collection of objects.... each object in turn has a collection of objects
[21:24]<rrd2uppnv>so basically i want obj[0].prop1, obj[0].prop2,obj[0].coll[0].prop1,obj[0].coll[0].prop2
[21:25]<rrd2uppnv>i have these coming from a database and stored in a dictionary<t,u>
[21:25]<fyfuym-syfggag>ok
[21:25]<fyfuym-syfggag>so obj[0] is a dictionary?
[21:26]<rrd2uppnv>obj is the dictionary
[21:26]<nnzjpfrr>wtf.
[21:26]<rrd2uppnv>obj[0] is the first object in the dictionary
[21:26]<fyfuym-syfggag>ok
[21:26]<nnzjpfrr>why don't you use generics?
[21:26]<fyfuym-syfggag>zeroflag he is
[21:27]<rrd2uppnv>im using generic dictionary cause they rock, right smelly
[21:27]<nnzjpfrr>then don't call them "obj" >_<
[21:27]<fyfuym-syfggag>zeroflag erm I call everything objSomething
[21:27]<fyfuym-syfggag>objArray
[21:27]<fyfuym-syfggag>objDictionary etc...
[21:28]<nnzjpfrr>hungarian? oO
[21:28]<fyfuym-syfggag>always
[21:28]<nnzjpfrr>OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!
[21:28]<nnzjpfrr>GET OUT OF MY SIGHT UNTIL YOU LEARNED HOW TO WRITE C#!
[21:28]<rrd2uppnv>my objects could be stored in a List<> (they were) but smelly's tests yesterday showed how much faster a dictionary was
[21:28]<fyfuym-syfggag>zeroflag I presume I am a beter coder then you
[21:28]<fyfuym-syfggag>:)
[21:29]<fyfuym-syfggag>jaybuffet you can bind to a dictionary I think
[21:29]<nnzjpfrr>maybe you can code.
[21:29]<nnzjpfrr>but I can programm.
[21:29]<fyfuym-syfggag>erm you cant spell tho
[21:29]<nnzjpfrr>and I can program in a maintainable manner - and that's the opposite of hungarian notation.

Back to #csharp
Or go to some related logs:
#debian
#gentoo
#netbsd
#gentoo
#gentoo