IRC Networks
Irc Logs Stats
Start date: 2007-09-27 02:48:27
Last update: 2008-10-24 20:19:38
Channels: 41
Logged Lines: 6230436
Size: 1825.51 MB
Powered by
Channel Info
Network: freenodeChannel: #gentoo-dev |
Search in www.irclog.org
Log from #gentoo-dev at freenode 2006-05-22
[17:08]<czzmjn_wjzc>lcars: ping
[17:08]<czzmjn_wjzc>Anyone know of a good LDAP howto guide?
[17:14]<sggdrgv>Flame_Away: come back
[17:15]<czzmjn_wjzc>seemant: miss him already?
[17:15]<sggdrgv>Cardoe_work: yeah my heart hurt
[17:16]<czzmjn_wjzc>seemant: heh. What's up?
[17:16]<sggdrgv>Cardoe_work: eh, not a lotta -- trying to figure out some autoconf things
[17:19]<sggdrgv>Cardoe_work: heh, setup-py wasn't scaling for us
[17:19]<sggdrgv>Cardoe_work: and autotools does some nice basic sanity checking, which helps
[17:19]<czzmjn_wjzc>ah
[17:20]<sggdrgv>Cardoe_work: I had already gotten to the point 7 months ago of wrapping Makefiles around the setup.py's we have here
[17:21]<sggdrgv>Cardoe_work: but at this point, it's grown beyond, because some parts need libraries from other parts, etc
[17:21]<przzyrr2>hmm.
[17:21]<przzyrr2>keyword dropping...
[17:21]<sggdrgv>ferringb: eh?
[17:22]<przzyrr2>care at all if a gap appears (ie, dropped keywords), but higher versions have it restored?
[17:22]<sggdrgv>sure
[17:22]<przzyrr2>net-im/jabberd fex, 1.4.4-r2 drops everything but amd64 and x86
[17:22]<przzyrr2>(transitioning from 1.4.3 at least)
[17:23]<przzyrr2>seemant: really matter though?
[17:23]<sggdrgv>ferringb: depends on why they were dropped
[17:23]<przzyrr2>not exactly decipherable via keywords set comparisons :)
[17:23]<sggdrgv>ferringb: there was one package recently that had keywords dropped for no effing reason at all, fex.
[17:24]<przzyrr2>http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/log
[17:24]<przzyrr2>fex
[17:24]<przzyrr2>the 1.4.4-r2... really matter at all?
[17:25]<czzmjn_wjzc>seemant: at some point you need to stop and do it right basically.
[17:25]<czzmjn_wjzc>I totally understand.
[17:25]<sggdrgv>ferringb: depends on the users on the hppa and sparc platforms of jabberd1 I would think
[17:25]<przzyrr2>seemant: automated scans
[17:25]<sggdrgv>ferringb: be interesting to know why they were dropped
[17:25]<przzyrr2>nfc
[17:25]<zyzxvdjzlx>ferringb: are you still upstream for confcache, or is that the portage team?
[17:25]<sggdrgv>ferringb: but overall I suppose there's no real use
[17:25]<przzyrr2>nightmorph: me/flameey I spose
[17:26]<przzyrr2>seemant: define "no real use"
[17:26]<przzyrr2>basically... just state what y'all want.
[17:26]<sggdrgv>ferringb: feels like there should be a ChangeLog entry at the very least about the missing keywords
[17:26]<przzyrr2>seemant: automated scan... that's pretty hard to pull off without guranteeing the changelog is in a proper structured format
[17:26]<sggdrgv>ferringb: true
[17:26]<przzyrr2>plus, I haven't written changelog parsing code yet :P
[17:27]<zgvzzus>ferringb: just take it out of emerge *runs*
[17:27]<przzyrr2>antarus: I like my speedy stats. likely psychological, but I have this notion that inserting stuff from emerge into it will blow that performance :)
[17:29]<przzyrr2>hmm. actually, works out fairly well
[17:29]<przzyrr2>if the version that drops it has -arch, doesn't flag it, else it does
[17:40]<przzyrr2>http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports <-- now with dropped keywords goodness.
[17:41]<przzyrr2>sparc seems to be the leader in getting dropped
[17:42]<sggdrgv>wow
[17:42]<przzyrr2>hmm?
[17:42]<sggdrgv>lotsa them
[17:42]<przzyrr2>ah, yeah.
[17:43]<rrrppgnd>yeah, sparc tends to get dropped a lot
[17:43]<przzyrr2>http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/test-runner/reports <-- example reports, should folks be interested in adding other tests in.
[17:43]<przzyrr2>documentation isn't great, but it's pretty obvious (start is the setup, feed is per 'chunk' processing, finish is the closer)
[17:47]<zyzxvdjzlx>!herd sparc
[17:47]<annvns>nightmorph: (sparc) bazik, eradicator, fmccor, gustavoz, hardave, joker, kumba, mcummings, peitholm, squash, weeve
[17:48]<vzlynz>anyone good with iwconfig ?
[18:19]<kyrrtraj>vapier, do you have some key combo to turn your wifi on/off? I think that's what it is refering to
[18:19]<vzlynz>no idea, this is just some loaner dell laptop
[18:19]<vzlynz>it's got SuSE on it
[18:20]<vzlynz>gonna look in the bios, brb
[18:20]<sggdrgv>hey vapier
[18:23]<sggdrgv>vapier: check that the firmware_class module is loaded
[18:27]<vzlynz>stupid bios had wireless disabled
[18:27]<vzlynz>eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0E:35:73:79:AC
[18:27]<svnnv-frlvjl>yay
[18:28]<vzlynz>both are using 802.11b now according to iwconfig
[18:29]<rpjzdrg>vapier: suck it
[18:29]<vzlynz>jforman: i know you want me to, but i'm busy atm
[18:29]<rpjzdrg>vapier: your state has the most fscked up DMV laws, what a pita
[18:32]<vzlynz>KingTaco: it wont take modulation
[18:32]<kyrrtraj>vapier, the ipw2200 or the other card?
[18:33]<kyrrtraj>iirc, the ipw card you can restrict the bands via module param
[18:33]<vzlynz>both
[18:33]<vzlynz># iwconfig eth1 modulation 11b
[18:33]<vzlynz>Error : unrecognised wireless request "modulation"
[18:33]<kyrrtraj>you must have a older version of iwconfig then
[18:34]<kyrrtraj>mike@koala ~ $ iwconfig --version
[18:34]<kyrrtraj>iwconfig Wireless-Tools version 29
[18:34]<vzlynz>iwconfig Wireless-Tools version 28
[18:34]<mz_bjgns_>ferringb: pong
[18:35]<przzyrr2>Mr_Bones_: what tests are you exempting from repoman these days?
[18:35]<mz_bjgns_>on the full run?
[18:35]<przzyrr2>yep
[18:36]<kyrrtraj>vapier, gimme a minute to downgrade to your version
[18:36]<svnnv-frlvjl>any locate experts around?
[18:36]<vzlynz>slocate steev-laptop ?
[18:36]<mz_bjgns_>no xmllint, no empty HOMEPAGE check, no stat for cvs header date check, no "silly KEYWORDs" check... maybe a couple more.
[18:36]<svnnv-frlvjl>vapier: yeah
[18:36]<vzlynz>empty HOMEPAGE check is dumb
[18:37]<svnnv-frlvjl>wondering if there is a way to disable .svn directories
[18:37]<przzyrr2>Mr_Bones_: clarify on silly keywords check
[18:37]<przzyrr2>KEYWORDS.stupid ?
[18:37]<mz_bjgns_>oh, .stupid, not .silly. yeah, that one.
[18:37]<przzyrr2>why did you exempt it?
[18:38]<kyrrtraj>vapier, looks like 28 doesn't have an option to limit the band. for the ipw2200, you should be able to set it via module parameter
[18:38]<mz_bjgns_>I don't care about that one enough to do anything about it.
[18:38]<vzlynz>steev-laptop: hmm, dunno :x
[18:38]<przzyrr2>Mr_Bones_: any additional checks you would suggest?







