IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #html

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[00:00]<vrf>background: red
[00:00]<vrf>aint working in the table.
[00:01]<vrf>oops my mistake.
[00:10]<vrf>hmm Firefox404
[00:10]<vrf>the thin thing only workes in firefox not in IE. They are not thin in IE
[00:11]<ymajfm>thin - 1px
[00:12]<20rv>vaq: thin isn't treated as 1px in IE, for no good reason.
[00:12]<20rv>Use 1px if you want as small as possible
[04:42]<dur0q>how do I get mozilla/firefox to put the rss feed indicator in the url line?
[04:45]<gjss>proper link element in the head part of the document
[04:45]<dur0q>moss: what is that link element?
[04:45]<gjss>google knows
[04:47]<dur0q>finally found it <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" href="url/to/rss/file">
[05:17]<snncnz_>http://billmonk.wordpress.com/ ( how can i centralize my page like that and leave spaces on both side of the page )
[05:27]<snncnz_>folks any idea?
[08:03]<zuvscyon>when I got to google.com the active component is automatically the search bar and i can start typing right away
[08:03]<zuvscyon>how do they do that?
[08:03]<sugmnv>javascript
[08:04]<mrmfyfjv>voodoo
[08:04]<zuvscyon>ahh, ok; i thought there was some property that could be set on the <input> tag
[10:34]<cee>hi
[10:34]<cee>http://pastebin.com/742450 overflow seems to work. but text-overflow:ellipsis; doesnt show up anywhere. how come?
[10:35]<cee>anyone?
[10:40]<2fun2nzzm>holy shit, there's a text-overflow:ellipsis?
[10:41]<2fun2nzzm>wait.
[10:41]<2fun2nzzm>what version of html are you using?
[10:41]<2fun2nzzm>/css
[10:42]<2fun2nzzm>I don't see a text-overflow property in www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html
[10:44]<2fun2nzzm>no browsers that I know of support any css3 properties yet.
[10:44]<cee>is there any way to achieve an effect similar to text-overflow:ellipsis ?
[11:33]<eele>how I can write the symbol "¿" for do it visible in linux and windows? If I write it directly, I obtain something like "?"
[11:39]<rfnw__>is there a way to disable the function of alt+click to download page to cache in a browser and use it for an other purposes ?
[11:39]<rfrnnm>arpz: maybe this will work &iquest;
[11:41]<rfnw__>I guess not :(
[11:42]<rfrnnm>alex__: sorry, i know not of such things
[11:42]<rfrnnm>arpz: http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/international/web/codehtml.html
[11:55]<mnzmzjjv>alex__: i don't understand your question
[12:02]<rfnw__>deadroot: well when you alt+click on a page link for example you download the page source on your computer, I would like to disable this.
[12:03]<mnzmzjjv>why?
[12:03]<mnzmzjjv>because preventing the download still won't prevent people from being able to see the page source
[12:04]<mnzmzjjv>thus i don't really see a point in disabling that feature
[12:04]<rfnw__>deadroot: no nothing to do with this
[12:05]<rfnw__>I actually found it onlcick="return false;"
[12:05]<mnzmzjjv>>.>
[12:06]<rfnw__>the goal is not to prevent people to download, the goal was to check a box while alt+clicking but this was also downloading the page to the client,
[12:06]<rfnw__>so now alt+click only check the box :)
[12:06]<mnzmzjjv>oookay
[12:06]<rfnw__>:) thanks
[12:32]<rfrnnm>I LOVE BEING A TURTLE!!!
[12:33]<2fun2nzzm>shit, you too?
[12:35]<rfrnnm>hell yes
[12:39]<rfnw__> /me thinks we should all do
[12:39]<2fun2nzzm>lol
[13:06]<aaffyga>hi
[13:08]<zjddndnsnzynuw>ïðåâåä
[13:59]<zjddndnsnzynuw>anyone alive up there? i've got a problem with XMLHttpRequest
[13:59]<mnzmzjjv>what is it?
[13:59]<sugmnv>may be alive here, but probly cant help
[14:00]<rfrnnm>it's turtles all the way down
[14:00]<zjddndnsnzynuw>open () and send () methods exist
[14:00]<zjddndnsnzynuw>how about close () /
[14:00]<mnzmzjjv>and RommeDeSerieux, just stating your problem could be considered a good manner in these rooms
[14:01]<mnzmzjjv>close()? why would you want that?
[14:01]<zjddndnsnzynuw>s/close () \//close () ?/
[14:01]<zjddndnsnzynuw>i need to open another request
[14:01]<mnzmzjjv>and the close(), assuming it exists, would help how?
[14:01]<zjddndnsnzynuw>umm maybe
[14:02]<zjddndnsnzynuw>i want to call open () right after calling send ()
[14:02]<zjddndnsnzynuw>i'll try creating a new instance of XMLHttpRequest now
[16:35]<pzzxvd>what would cause a redirected html page containing javascript not to execute it's javascript?
[16:37]<mnzmzjjv>the user disabled the javascript
[16:37]<mnzmzjjv>or a bug in your logic
[16:51]<pzzxvd>but the javascript executes find in a browser as a .js file
[16:51]<mnzmzjjv>which browser is causing the problems?
[16:57]<pzzxvd>I am using i.e 6
[16:57]<pzzxvd>it works if I save the javascript in a .js file and it opens up in a browser fine
[16:57]<pzzxvd>however if I place the same js in a server, and try to execute it via a 301 redirect nothing happens
[16:57]<mnzmzjjv>probably ie's fault then
[16:58]<mnzmzjjv>a redirect?
[16:58]<mnzmzjjv>i think that could be the cause of the problem
[16:58]<zuvscyon>fgrhty: i hope you know exactly what a 301 does
[16:59]<pzzxvd>basically I am trying to redirect users hotlinking my images to another image, contained in the javascript, the redirected js file is placed in the htaccess, even though it redirects to the js file nothing is executed
[17:00]<zuvscyon>why are you doing all this?
[17:01]<mnzmzjjv>fgrhty: to prevent people from leeching your bandwidth?
[17:02]<pzzxvd>yes
[17:03]<mnzmzjjv>fgrhty: then check for the referrer HTTP header. if the referrer doesn't come from any legit web page, you deny them access to the image
[17:03]<pzzxvd>as of yesterday someone just downloaded 400MB of one single file!
[17:03]<pzzxvd>have already tried that, seems they have a way around that, I would like to try it with a javascript
[17:03]<rfrnnm>that's rape
[17:04]<mnzmzjjv>referrers could be easily be forge. but the majority of web surfers don't forge their headers
[17:04]<mnzmzjjv>fgrhty: only one abuser? one IP address?
[17:05]<pzzxvd>just one of the most prolific
[17:05]<mnzmzjjv>block that IP then

Back to #html
Or go to some related logs:
#reactos
#blender
#gentoo
#gentoo
#gentoo