[12:39]<rrffnn>i mean having a net no knowing who is who and who talks to whom makes it a little difficult to find out where to tap anyone [12:40]<rrffnn>because that would require all information in the same place, beein illegal in both US an EU afaik [12:40]<hggc>sure you are right, but spoofing the sender's IP address add no privacy at all [12:41]<rrffnn>apart from that it's practically impossible to store that much information for the time beeing [12:41]<hggc>anyway i;d love to discuss this with you some other time but i need to get back to work. [12:41]<rrffnn>Henk: righ, so do i [12:49]<zfgz>namp tells me port 111 (rpcbind) is 'filtered' but it should be open due to rule -s nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn -j ACCEPT . I have used other ports through this rule. any idea? [12:59]<hggc>alnr, maybe rpcbind is rejecting you (look at etc/hosts.allow|deny) [13:00]<zfgz>Henk: tx, but I found out my provider is filtering port 111 [13:46]<rrffnn>alnr: well, if thats the case, you can redirect to 111 from another port [13:46]<rrffnn>i did the same a couple of days ago, to tunnel openvpn through a proxy that only would connect to 443 [13:47]<rrffnn>so i redirected 443 to the default openvpn-port (1194) and everything works find now :) [15:03]<-- svgvsdyzgjvr_ xrs>/dev/null") [15:17]<rrffnn>dammit, kernel 2.6.16 is so screwed [15:17]<mnmjers>no way, whats you problem? and shouldnt that be topic in kernel channel? [15:19]<rvdrv>haha [15:19]<rvdrv>no man it's ok, if you use iptables you sure got a linux kernel [15:25]<rrffnn>just wanted to express my wrath :) [15:26]<rrffnn>switching back to kernel 2.6.14 [15:37]<svzdczz>im using 2.6.15.6 and it's beautiful [16:53]<zj20>callee: I have been pretty happy with various 2.6.15 kernels. 2.6.16 is the development branch. :) [17:05]<rrffnn>rob0: there are however no grsecurity patches for 2.6.15 only 14 and 16 [17:06]<rrffnn>i will however try default testing kernel 2.6.15 [17:07]<rrffnn>maybe a desktop doesnt need that kind of stuff anyway [17:07]<rrffnn>grsecurity on the server is fine [17:19]<rrffnn>rob0: even 2.6.15 fails to bring up dri, but at least it doesnt crash :) [18:15]<jgjj>hi [18:15]<jgjj>some help here [18:16]<jgjj>I used firestarter but i disliked how much cpu it consumes, so i am thinking of using its iptables tweaks without launching it [18:16]<jgjj>do u know how to do so ? [18:18]<jgjj>hello [18:19]<zj2wow0>3/c
