IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #reactos

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[07:34]<wzwdzzrjg>nice, trunk auto-installs my nic drivers from the cdrom.
[07:34]<wzwdzzrjg>\o/
[07:36]<wzwdzzrjg>!bug 1473
[07:36]<vnaxbjv>http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1473
[07:57]<wzwdzzrjg>*yawn*
[07:59]<sxzmjwffzzn>heh
[08:00]<sxzmjwffzzn>Hmm, does it work in WINE?
[08:04]<mdzyr>only cedega
[08:04]<mdzyr>unlike most other games these days it doesn't install kernel drivers
[08:08]<jrdwbfd>Good morning
[08:09]<jrdwbfd>nice summer weather today!
[08:10]<jrdwbfd>It doesn't feel like a refridgerator at all when I went out today, thats nice!
[08:17]<tgrgfrgg>does anyboy have any idea why explorer doesn't compile with gvv 4.1?
[08:22]<njjzufisfrrd>hmm
[08:22]<njjzufisfrrd>you should try gcc 4.1 instead
[08:22]<mzrfgyw>yeah because
[08:22]<mzrfgyw>of course
[08:22]<mzrfgyw>the solution to it not compiling with gcc v4.1
[08:23]<mzrfgyw>would be
[08:23]<mzrfgyw>to use
[08:23]<mdzyr>gcc 4.1 complains about ((uintptr_t) ((SomeType*) 0)->someMember) and it drives me nuts
[08:23]<mzrfgyw>gcc v4.1
[08:23]<mzrfgyw>lol
[08:23]<mdzyr>need an & in there
[08:23]<mdzyr>((uintptr_t) &((SomeType*) 0)->someMember)
[08:23]<mzrfgyw>it's because C++ is still somewhat in flux
[08:23]<mzrfgyw>unlike C
[08:23]<mdzyr>it gives a warning about an invalid null pointer
[08:24]<mdzyr>gcc 4.1 requires 2 different offsetof macros
[08:24]<mdzyr>it warns you if you do that
[08:24]<mdzyr>they say to use __builtin_offsetof
[08:24]<mdzyr>but now there's 2 of those
[08:25]<mdzyr>one for normal and one for templates
[08:25]<mdzyr>it's annoying, since no other compiler requires them to be separate
[08:25]<mdzyr>our game compiles with 4000+ such warnings on mac
[08:26]<mdzyr>and we don't know how to turn it off
[08:26]<mdzyr>and fixing them would require considerable work because of the separation
[08:27]<tgrgfrgg>http://rafb.net/paste/results/4xxXXw77.html <- argh
[08:32]<mdzyr>whatever that means1
[08:33]<sxzmjwffzzn>lol
[10:08]<syz_frwrlur>Wow, I'm surprised I'm still connected.
[10:39]<gznzvljzm>Good moring
[10:39]<zydvz2jz>Good day! Who is working on PolyPolygon, Polygon and or Polygonline and the rest?
[10:40]<xljussyg>not me ;)
[10:42]<zydvz2jz>Well we have a bug in IntGdiPolyon or I have a bug in GetGlyphOutline
[10:43]<zydvz2jz>My money is on GlyphOutline and the WineHQ math club.
[10:44]<zydvz2jz>pic vector at 6592 and it is drawing off the screen
[10:46]<mzrrjgmygmnm>woohoo
[10:46]<mzrrjgmygmnm>dynamic memory without mallocs or new :D
[10:58]<gznzvljzm>jimtabor ; it can be our IntGdiPolyon
[10:59]<gznzvljzm>we have some graphic bugs there and there
[10:59]<gznzvljzm>in ros
[12:05]<fyzn2rff>Hello
[12:05]<2ggggg2rc>hi
[12:06]<2ggggg2rc>Fireball: how can i commit to locked file?
[12:06]<fyzn2rff>break lock, commit, and lock again by audit user
[12:07]<cia-t>03hpoussin * r22172 10reactos/dll/win32/setupapi/ (7 files):
[12:07]<cia-t>Extract some code from devinst.c to new files: devclass.c (device class functions), driver.c (Driver install/enumeration functions), interface.c (Interface install/enumeration functions)
[12:07]<cia-t>devinst.c is now 123 Kb instead of 285 Kb.
[12:07]<cia-t>No code change.
[12:07]<fyzn2rff>or you may not lock again, but just leave svn:needs-lock property, I pay attention only to the property, not actual locked status
[12:09]<2ggggg2rc>hmm
[12:10]<gznzvljzm>Fireball wine test shlwapi
[12:10]<gznzvljzm>does not working in windows 2k
[12:10]<gznzvljzm>for shreg test
[12:10]<gznzvljzm>can u confirm that
[12:18]<afrw_bfmyrr_frrj>70% done
[12:18]<afrw_bfmyrr_frrj>current weight: 25 pounds
[12:18]<gznzvljzm>70% of what
[12:19]<fyzn2rff>wow, alex is still building
[12:19]<fyzn2rff>GreatLord - let me try
[12:19]<2ggggg2rc>:-)
[12:22]<fyzn2rff>GreatLord
[12:22]<fyzn2rff>shreg: 1 failure
[12:23]<fyzn2rff>all other tests - 0 failures
[12:23]<fyzn2rff>under windows
[12:23]<fyzn2rff>xp sp2
[12:23]<gznzvljzm>which test
[12:23]<gznzvljzm>line number
[12:24]<gznzvljzm>I will try take care of some bugs there then
[12:24]<fyzn2rff>shreg.c:319: Test failed: SHQueryValueExA failed
[12:24]<fyzn2rff>this is XP
[12:24]<gznzvljzm>thx
[12:25]<gznzvljzm>I will try fix some bugs now in shlwapi
[12:27]<2ggggg2rc>i dont a failure...
[12:27]<2ggggg2rc>D:\reactos>output-i386\regtests\winetests\shlwapi\shlwapi_winetest.exe shreg
[12:27]<2ggggg2rc>shreg.c:96:sExplen1 = (12)
[12:27]<2ggggg2rc>shreg.c:98:sExplen2 = (43)
[12:27]<2ggggg2rc>shreg: 45 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
[12:28]<fyzn2rff>good then
[12:28]<fyzn2rff>I mean
[12:28]<fyzn2rff>strange
[12:29]<gznzvljzm>acoding of some wine devloper
[12:29]<gznzvljzm>shreg test fails some windows version
[12:29]<gznzvljzm>and some version of windows it works
[12:45]<bynnnx><@GreatLord> shreg test fails some windows version << because its made for testing broken wine code
[12:48]<gznzvljzm>Bizzeh
[12:48]<gznzvljzm>I think windows have problem
[12:49]<gznzvljzm>I pass all test in win2k

Back to #reactos
Or go to some related logs:
#gentoo
#gentoo
#reactos
#cisco
#cisco